VC Connect ACT 2007
July 28th, 2007Last Wednesday I attended VC Connect ACT 2007 and was impressed by the impressive line up of speakers considering this was a Canberra event. Anyone who lives in Sydney will tell you how boring Canberra is and how it is purely a city built around Government infrastructure, but seriously, so much of that is changing. Yes, we even have our own local VCs.
What was even more impressive at VC Connect was that many people in the room had just jumped off planes from New York City and the UK, destined for Canberra. There is genuinely a lot of keen interest to invest in Australian innovation particularly in the fields of ICT and Biotech. As Doron Ben-Meir (Principal VC from Jagen) mentioned, one of the reasons that ICT companies more often than not receive venture capital funding, is because technology makes them so scalable. This scalability allows the business to rapidly multiply profits because its basically a write once sell many scenario, as with most forms of technology. This is not to say that traditional businesses are not suitable for venture capital funding. Doron sat at my table, so we got to have a brief chat. Doron seemed highly driven and knew exactly what he looked for in entrepreneurs, he was also quite young to be in the position of handing out money to others for their promising ideas, which was also inspiring.
Rachel Slattery from Slattery IT (The event organiser) ate lunch with us to find out about Rate the PLATE. It was great to meet her and I will simply say she is pretty passionate about the whole VC/startup scene in Australia and knows just about everyone in this field. She publishes a weekly newsletter about the ways in which Australian companies are using technology and about happenings in the Australian technology space - go and subscribe if you haven’t already.
Then there was Bill Bartee - a prominent entrepreneur turned VC who moved to Australia from the US. Bill backed SEEK during the early days as well as Looksmart just to name a couple. Bill made a big point that so often entrepreneurs that he has backed don’t proactively come to him asking for help and that they should. Basically, a VC provides much more than capital - they are a jackpot resource of knowledge and experience that the entrepreneur can call upon to help make the best decisions. Bill did say that when he worked with the SEEK founders, they were basically perfect in anticipating just about everything that he was going to recommend to them. I was going to approach Bill and have a chat, however after his speech, he had to leave straight away.
Also inspiring was seeing Nick McNaughton from Blue Cove Ventures giving his advice. I also caught an interview with Nick in last Sunday’s Canberra Times. Basically, during the past year, Nick has looked at 65 businesses and rejected 62 of them. Another statistic to drum home to entrepreneurs that they must do their homework before approaching a VC. Just because you are passionate about your idea and have a dream like the other ten million people will not convince someone to invest in you. Nick has some excellent dot points outlining roughly what he is looking for. You’ll notice one of the points “Clear ownership of any IP” - Intellectual Property was one of the main things that almost all of the VCs were adamant about. However, John Riedl made a very strong point that IP is one thing, but if you had the choice, don’t spend all your energy protecting your IP, simply build the product. John said that there were two main ways to protect IP. The first being legally through patents etc but the second one being by actually building the product and getting out there and creating a reputation around it so that it is in peoples’ minds. Being first to market was a massive point that John repeatedly kept driving - and other VCs in the room backed this up with examples. If you are not first to market, you can spend the next 2-3 years in overdrive trying to play catchup. John had to be the biggest character in the room, he had a classic grandfather sense of humour and just had a fantastic presence about him.
David Landers from Allen & Buckeridge also had a wealth of experience. He mentioned that once a Term sheet had been signed between the entrepreneur and VC, he can’t remember any instances where the deal was actually abandoned. Basically, this means that if you get to the signed term sheet stage, you have a pretty good guarantee of completing the deal, but not quite 100%. Mike Zimmerman from TVP also said about 80% of his signed term sheets had progressed into completed deals.
Roger Price openly contributed stories from his own learnings about Australians rushing too fast into the US market. He made the analogy that Australia is basically a single, large US state and that you are far better off focusing on getting business locally before committing to the huge effort required to succeed in the US market. Roger said that it takes an Aussie 2-3 years to properly understand the US market after moving to the US and that you are far better off hiring a ‘yank’ to do that job for you. Roger learnt this the best way, first hand, where he lost about $6 million going down this path with a previous company. Although its a big figure, that kind of loss almost directly adds the same amount of value to Roger’s experience. You just can’t beat learning things first hand and you can guarantee he knows exactly what to do next time, while so many others not having gone down the same path may go off and make the same mistake. Mistakes are the way to success.
Matthew Michalewic from SolveIT reinforced the point that there has to be complete transparency between the entrepreneur and VC at all times. Even when something small happens to not go in your favour, you must be totally up front in telling your VC about this straight away. Eventually it is going to all come out in the wash anyway and it takes 2 seconds to ruin your reputation which always precedes you. Tell them the good with the bad at all times and you will always have their full faith and support. Part of running a startup is facing the huge number of challenges and working with the VC to overcome them, the VC probably has experience in overcoming a similar problem anyway. Matthew was inspiringly young for his achievements to date also.
All of the other speakers were very knowledgable, I learnt something from all of them. Overall it a was a great way to get inside the minds of a room full of experienced VCs and entrepreneurs and see what makes them tick and what they are looking for. I would definitely attend again next year and it has influenced our approach with Rate the PLATE.
